Projecting Gender Identity in Argumentative Written Discourse
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Analyzing Argumentative Discourse Units in Online Interactions
Argument mining of online interactions is in its infancy. One reason is the lack of annotated corpora in this genre. To make progress, we need to develop a principled and scalable way of determining which portions of texts are argumentative and what is the nature of argumentation. We propose a two-tiered approach to achieve this goal and report on several initial studies to assess its potential.
متن کاملIdentifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays
In this paper, we present a novel approach for identifying argumentative discourse structures in persuasive essays. The structure of argumentation consists of several components (i.e. claims and premises) that are connected with argumentative relations. We consider this task in two consecutive steps. First, we identify the components of arguments using multiclass classification. Second, we clas...
متن کاملAnalyzing the Structure of Argumentative Discourse
Consider a discourse situation where the speaker tries to convince the hearer of a particular point of view. The first task for the hearer is to understand what it is the speaker wants him to believe-to analyze the structure of the argument being presented, before judging credibility and eventually responding. This paper describes a model for the analysis of arguments that includes: • a theory ...
متن کاملIdentifying Justifications in Written Dialogs by Classifying Text as Argumentative
In written dialog, discourse participants need to justify claims they make, to convince the reader the claim is true and/or relevant to the discourse. This paper presents a new task (with an associated corpus), namely detecting such justifications. We investigate the nature of such justifications, and observe that the justifications themselves often contain discourse structure. We therefore dev...
متن کاملHermes: Supporting Argumentative Discourse in Multi-Agent Decision Making
This paper describes HERMES, a system that enhances group decision making by providing an argumentation framework to the agents involved. The system organizes the existing knowledge in a discussion graph, which consists of issues, alternatives, positions and preference relations. Argumentation is performed through a set of discourse acts which trigger appropriate procedures for the propagation ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
سال: 2018
ISSN: 2200-3452,2200-3592
DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.201